MPEG2ENCODE DOWNLOAD

That and I have to figure out how to crowbar it in and adjust the parameters accordingly. In file included from macroblock. We'll defer support for mpeg2enc to a later date. Or is ffmpeg a better choice? One of the reasons for sticking with mpeg2decode and mpeg2encode is that they both work under Windows and they are lightweight. Got a patch for a bug? It does not mean we won't use it, it just means we need to do additional research before we can bless it as a delegate in ImageMagick.

Uploader:	Fejas
Date Added:	27 August 2011
File Size:	40.81 Mb
Operating Systems:	Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads:	28842
Price:	Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

mpeg2encode licensing issue - ImageMagick

One of the reasons for sticking with mpeg2decode and mpeg2encode is that they both work under Windows and they are lightweight.

So I figured it's not a workable option.

We hesitate to depend on unstable software or software that is not readily available. But if it is - if one of the other output formats works and you can work with the filenames - then yes, mpeh2encode would probably be the sensible choice.

But aside from that, yeah, mpeg2dec would be the logical choice smaller and I think fewer deps than ffmpeg - only it doesn't actually seem possible to get it to do what we want.

If someone wants to tackle this problem and post a patch, we will get it into mpeg2enclde future release of ImageMagick. Got a patch for a bug? For now I'll see if it's possible to centralize discussion of this issue here and in Launchpad - maybe if we can pull in the various places it's been discussed, we'll find someone who has the smarts to fix it.

There's a problem here. Mpege2ncode are in agreement with you but the ImageMagick developers are currently swamped and we will not get to this problem for a minimum of several months. BTW, the Google results for "mpeg2encode" and "mpeg2decode", if you look at them, will give you an idea of the extent of this issue - people from all sorts of distributions keep finding out that these applications are missing and so the ImageMagick functionality doesn't work.

In member function 'void MacroBlock:: I think ffmpeg is the best option.

ImageMagick

Our question is if we use mpeg2enc for encoding should we not use mpeg2dec for decoding? Actually completely separate projects. This means that I, as a packager for Mandriva, cannot have mpeg2encode available for ImageMagick to use, so our ImageMagick package can't do the operations for which it relies on mpeg2encode.

Keep in mind that you could generate a patch specific to ImageMagick on Mandriva that uses mpep2enc until we get a blessed patch. Or is ffmpeg a better choice? Confirm that ffmpeg is your final decision as the best MPEG mpeg2sncode. That and I have to figure out how to crowbar it in and adjust the parameters accordingly.

If so, we'll get the patch into the ImageMagick subversion trunk in about 2 hours. In file included pmeg2encode macroblock. We'll defer support for mpeg2enc to a later date. It does not mean we won't use it, it just means we need to do additional research before we can bless it as a delegate in ImageMagick.

MPEG-FAQ 4.1:

I thought I'd reported this somewhere before but can't find any trace of it, so I'm doing it again. Include the ImageMagick version, OS, mpge2encode any command-line required to reproduce the problem.

The only other obvious thing that comes to mind is transcode, but at least on MDV, transcode's deps are rather heavier than ffmpeg's. I know mpeg2encode cannot be made available in Fedora because of the licensing issue I've discussed this with Fedora's licensing guy, Tom Callaway.

Is there any possibility of this?

ImageMagick mpeg2encode error

It would be better if ImageMagick could switch to a free tool, like mpeg2enc from mjpegtools. In member function 'int MotionVector:: Its license terms - you can see them here: The patch is in the subversion trunk and will be available as ImageMagick 6. As far as I can see it's hard coded to output files simply in the current directory, with sequential numerical names, and it only seems to do pgmnot ppm.